It’s a punchline in and of itself: a mobster walks into a psychiatrists office. So goes the opening scene in The Sopranos, a black polo’d Tony Soprano sitting inside a timber veneer’d and vertical blind’d psychiatrists’ office stylised within an inch of International Style. Tony observes of himself “I’ve been thinking… It’s good to be in something from the ground floor, and I came too late for that, I know. But lately I’m getting the feeling that I came in at the end, and the best is over.” It’s 1999 in this office. 9/11 hasn’t happened yet, mass mobilization of capital markets through neo-liberalism is peaking, the Cold War has thawed, and Carolyn Bessette is still alive. Camera pans and between the patient and the doctor, in the centre of the frame, there it is: the divan.

Divan’s, Chaise’s Daybed’s, Settee’s, whatever the nomenclature, they’re not really the most usable piece of furniture. They don’t really slot into the domestic landscape as other pieces do, they don’t have the same practical profile of a table, a chair, or a bed. Their scale is large, yet only have the application for a single-person’s use, they don’t look seamless when placed in a parallel line to a wall, yet at a perpendicular or angled placement they take up too much room. They’re more of a nod, a wink, a signifier of style and status. Is that a Mies? A Le Corb?? A XVII e siècle French Daybed??? I asked my dad about the chaise lounge my grandmother had in her bedroom when she was alive, and he called it a dog bed covered in so much dust you needed an antihistamine to sit on it.
The motif of the therapist sitting behind the patient lying on a divan, the linchpin to pretty much every single Woody Allen joke and New Yorker cartoon ever created, was birthed, along with psychoanalysis itself, by Sigmund Freud. Originally gifted to him from a patient, its original form of what we now know as the prototypical therapy-divan was actually a simpler Biedermeier sofa, a fashionable beige linen staple in the late 19th century. Freud appropriated the beige by laying a Persian wool carpet over it with jewel-coloured chenille pillows to create the object we now know. It’s an object which doesn’t necessarily pertain so much to the “epitome of ‘Oriental’ hedonism” as historian Marina Warmer wrote (also, can we please stop using the term ‘Oriental’?), but rather something you might see in a decades-established grungy sharehouse, or a listing for a free sofa on Facebook Marketplace. Like a lived-in, aging human body, or the formation of a million-year-old rock, the sofa has a creased, terrestrial quality to it. Its folds, lumps, and textures are imprints of experiences and revelations. To lie in it would be to bite into Isaac Newton’s apple, and I love to dance with the devil.
Freud had used divans before the days of psychotherapy, experimenting with everything from electrotherapy to massage and therapeutic baths, and eventually abandoning those techniques due to their little evidence of success in his patients. It wasn’t until his postulation of ‘free association’ taking hold within his practice that the divan really took its place in the spotlight. Freud believed that the technique of asking a patient to lie down, without making any eye contact, to say what readily came to mind, could provide new insights for the analyst. The divan helped create an environment that was both clinical yet intimate, allowing for the patient to unravel the skeins from their unconscious mind -- while Freud could beat a chenille cushion with his fist in the background. When Freud had to flee the Nazi’s in Austria in 1938 and moved his family and his practice to the UK, the divan fled with him too.
The carpet that was placed over the divan, a 19th century Persian Qashqa'i wool rug that was also gifted to Freud, sows seeds in other cultural references. Like the pre-Disney trope of the Magic Carpet. From the Middle Eastern folk tales One Thousand and One Nights, it is written of the fantastical carpet that Whoever sitteth on this carpet and willeth in thought to be taken up and set down upon other site will, in the twinkling of an eye, be borne thither, be that place nearhand or distant many a day's journey and difficult to reach – a little wordy, yes, but which ostensibly reads as whoever sits on this carpet (and for arguments sake, Freud’s couch) and wants/wills to be transported elsewhere will be taken to that place no matter how far or difficult it is to get to. There is a certain symmetry between a magic carpet taking you wherever you desire in the world, gravity-free, and desire’s dominion over time and space in the practice of free association in psychoanalysis, no? Thinking about Freud’s theories and how they celebrated the meaningfulness of the slip of the lip, the pun, and the double entrendre, it’s perhaps ironic, intentionally or not, that far from sweeping things under the carpet, Sigmund Freud lifted his carpet off the ground and into the hotseat.
